<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>DisplayFusion RSS: Could we have a separate forum Channel for Beta Versions?</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e</link>
<description>DisplayFusion RSS: Could we have a separate forum Channel for Beta Versions?</description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 13:01:45 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e</generator>
<item>
<title>RE: Could we have a separate forum Channel for Beta Versions?</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/could-we-have-a-separate-forum-channel-for-beta-versions/?ID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e#2</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 21:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/could-we-have-a-separate-forum-channel-for-beta-versions/?ID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e#2</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the feedback! We'll have to think about that one, as I don't think just separating it out into stable vs. beta would give much benefit. In that case, you could search for something and find a thread that was for DisplayFusion 3.0, which also isn't much help.
I will put this on our lis...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Thanks for the feedback! We'll have to think about that one, as I don't think just separating it out into stable vs. beta would give much benefit. In that case, you could search for something and find a thread that was for DisplayFusion 3.0, which also isn't much help.<br/>
<br/>
I will put this on our list for consideration so that we can take internal notes on what would help organize the posts better <img src="https://www.displayfusion.com/MediaCommon/SVGs/FontAwesome/face-smile.light.svg" alt=":)" style="box-sizing:border-box;position:relative;overflow:hidden;vertical-align:middle !important;width:16px;height:16px;" HelpButtonData=":)" HelpButtonDataAlign="BelowMiddle" /><br/>
<br/>
Thanks!
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Could we have a separate forum Channel for Beta Versions?</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/could-we-have-a-separate-forum-channel-for-beta-versions/?ID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/could-we-have-a-separate-forum-channel-for-beta-versions/?ID=018d0dc5-b9fb-75f0-95ed-ff9bd48e2d6e</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[I'm avoiding installing V11 Beta for the time being - v10.1.2 (latest Win 11 Build - 22631.3007) has a couple of quirks, but it's 99% stable.
The chatter between versions is messy, the devs should separate discussions. Search function won't ensure people can find potential help about their versi...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
I'm avoiding installing V11 Beta for the time being - v10.1.2 (latest Win 11 Build - 22631.3007) has a couple of quirks, but it's 99% stable.<br/>
The chatter between versions is messy, the devs should separate discussions. Search function won't ensure people can find potential help about their version, and will end up being frustrating<br/>
Just a suggestion, would take a few minutes to setup and make obvious.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>