DisplayFusion RSS: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d DisplayFusion RSS: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:48:19 GMT en hourly 1 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#12 Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:15:05 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#12 DisplayFusion If you just have 1 monitor enabled, and reduce the resolution to a standard 1920x1080, is it still choppy if you run the screensaver? ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#11 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:29:59 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#11 DisplayFusion It says I am currently running 11.2 Beta 5 on Windows 10 22H2 19045.6332 ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#10 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:28:18 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#10 DisplayFusion It looks like I downloaded and installed DisplayFusionSetup-11.0.5.exe on 1/5/2025. I usually will check for updates when I do an install so if a newer version would have pulled that way I would have likely been running it. If there are any installer logs you can point me to I am happy to check them. I did a quick search for log in the install folder and only found 2 dlls containing "log". ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#9 Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:29:55 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#9 DisplayFusion Just to confirm, you were originally testing with the non beta version, 11.1.1, at the start of this thread? ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#8 Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:47:41 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#8 DisplayFusion It might be a little better, I didn't think to repro before I updated, but still has major performance issues on 3 4k screens using a transition like cross fade.

Each picture change with cross fade you see the bar roll down the screen changing pixels as the image fades in. It probably takes 500-1200 ms per pass and maybe 10 passes to fully paint the image. On initial load sometimes only 1 image loads with gray screens on the others. One time one image loaded and another one started, but the fade in stopped after 1 or 2 passes so the image was 10-20% faded in and it just hung there mostly grayed out until the next timed change to a new image.

I was using a 10 second delay for testing and tried with Use Preview Mode both checked and unchecked. I disabled transitions and it works acceptably, but still is noticably slow chaning the image with a very visible top to bottom repaint or pixel blitting ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#7 Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:51:56 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#7 DisplayFusion We've released a new beta with some changes to our screen saver code. Could you try it out and let me know if you run into any issues? ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#6 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:59:41 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#6 DisplayFusion Ah gotcha, we have an idea here to fix this up, we'll let you know when we have anything further.

Thanks! ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#5 Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:43:37 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#5 DisplayFusion
Quote:
Where are you choosing the transition options?


Settings --> Screen Saver
In the middle of the settings screen there is a DropDownList (DDL) that has DisplayFusion Photos selected. To the right of that there is a settings button. Click that.

The resulting dialog has a DDL for Transition.

Also in that box size mode is set to centre and Behavior is "Staggered Image Change". The next 6 checkboxes are unchecked. Delay is 60 (reduce for testing) and Refresh image list after (minutes) is 240.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Jon ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#4 Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:36:33 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#4 DisplayFusion Where are you choosing the transition options? ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#3 Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:09:16 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#3 DisplayFusion I tried the new beta today. It seems like a step in the right direction. Sometimes the transitions (I tested cross fade and swipe down) happen smoothly even with the larger higher quality jpg files. However sometimes, they still stutter but in a different way. It is no longer the flashy stutter on each step in the transition, but they periodically pause for an irregular amount of time. It happens more often when two screens are updating at the same time. I am testing with an 8 second interval with the preview button and "use preview mode for this screen saver..." checked. 3 4k screens with "Span Screen Saver Across All monitors" checked

While I haven't seen your code my first guess would be it's a threading / locking / blocking type issue on those times that it pauses mid update. A simple solution might be to add a lock so that only one screen can update at a time during the screensaver updates. This would add a little time to the interval for any screen blocked, but should prevent a host of possible performance and/or stability issues. I saw a couple of times that the transition never completed after 15-20 seconds and moved the mouse to end the preview. Not sure if more time would have resolved that or if there is a hang or deadlock type situation that can happen.

I am happy to test this as much as needed if that helps.

Thanks,
Jon ]]> RE: Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#2 Wed, 15 Jan 2025 14:50:05 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d#2 DisplayFusion We've released a new beta that might fix this up, you can grab it here: https://www.displayfusion.com/Download/Beta/

Please let me know if you run into any issues after updating.

Thanks! ]]> Wallpaper Transitions Poor Performance FPS https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:44:55 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/wallpaper-transitions-poor-performance-fps/?ID=01944cd0-1d2d-71b4-8c69-5bf35e003f9d DisplayFusion I am having performance issues with the wallpaper especially with transitions. I found several old thread on this, but nothing to help me resolve it.

https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/low-fps-on-displayfusion-photo-screen-saver/?ID=42dee990-19c5-4fa2-b49d-8c6f005979c2
https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/full-screen-game-fps-drop-when-changing-wallpaper/?ID=a98ffa0b-7e99-430a-a80f-9392b0d438e1
https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/displayfusion-photos-screen-saver-fade-transition-is-very-jerky/?ID=252e4313-4514-409e-a5d5-15a5de95413f

I know there were several references to not being able to reproduce this and I think I have some ideas on how to do that.

1. Use 3 4k Monitors
2. Use photo jpeg files saved with 100% quality at 4240 x 2385 resolution
3. pick a transition such as disolve

Those jpegs typically of what I get from my a 12 MP sony camera output via Capture One at highest quality to jpeg range in size from 4.7 - 10.5 MB each. That file size seems to be a big issue. If I save the jpg down to 50 or 85 percent the transition performance while still stuttering / flickering due to the low FPS is much better than the larger 5 - 10 MB files. This is leading me to believe this may be an IO issue in how the transition is calculated. It seems this is being calculated in realtime and not cached since the file size is speeding things up. The screen updates shouldn't be an issue as the same number of pixels are ultimately being output to the screen.

I'm not sure if you are manually calculaing the transtion and writing the pixels or using an API to transition, but something is not optimal here. Either pre calculating the transition steps if manual or figuring out the correct API to transition smoothly should be doable.

Machine I am testing this on is way over spec'd (12 cores 4GHZ, Nvidia 3090 (studio Driver 566.36), 128 GB RAM, 5 NVME drives) running Windows 10 with current updates. If you need some test images or settings I am happy to provide those, but this seems to be pretty easy to reproduce on my system with both Span enabled or disabled.

Thanks,
Jon ]]>