https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987 DisplayFusion RSS: Windows 7, build 7600+ Fri, 29 May 2026 20:58:20 GMT en hourly 1 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#7 Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:13:39 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#7 DisplayFusion I've had nothing but good things to say so far about Windows 7 as well. I can't wait for the official RTM so I can finalize my testing and release DisplayFusion 3.1. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#6 Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:37:45 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#6 DisplayFusion Whereas, in a completely new and surprising move, M$ releases some code to help optimize Linux running on top of Windows (as in Hyper-V scenarios) so they can no make the new version 8000.20000.

(j/k folks)

In all seriousness, though, I am probably going to (finally!) get a Technet sub so I can start getting ISOs from M$ directly instead of having to peruse the net to find them....

just as a thought - I finally upgraded my parent's Vista-based Dell to W7 - they are almost ecstatic right now....

And as soon as I can convince them that dual monitors is more productive for them then I can get them to buy a second license of DF ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#5 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:00:02 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#5 DisplayFusion By the way, the latest leaked build is 7600.16385. Previous to that (the one that was thought to be RTM before we found out it wasn't) was 7600.16384. It's speculated by some that 7600.16385 may be the RTM, while others think that one more build may come out that gets bumped to 7600.17000. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#4 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:37:26 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#4 DisplayFusion @Atreus: Thanks, that's what I was hoping. If anyone else manages to get any experience with any of the 7600 builds (RTM final or otherwise) I would love to hear how it works for you. Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#3 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:54:00 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#3 DisplayFusion It's definitely very close to the finished product, but it's not known whether it's an RTM Candidate or the RTM itself. Either way, there's nothing I've noticed in it that breaks any DisplayFusion stuff. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#2 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:23:46 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987#2 DisplayFusion I've got it (the 64bit version) and will install it soon. It's supposed to be the rock-solid RTM. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:16:35 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/windows-7-build-7600/?ID=05c55091-c137-49eb-8948-a012751ae987 DisplayFusion There are rumors circulating that Windows 7 build 7600 has made it's way onto the internet. I don't have access to it yet through MSDN, but I was wondering if anyone here has had a chance to get it through alternate methods. If so, have you noticed anything different? Graphics, UI, any DF issues? Thanks! ]]>