<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>DisplayFusion RSS: Window snapping is good, but could be even better</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87</link>
<description>DisplayFusion RSS: Window snapping is good, but could be even better</description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:16:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87</generator>
<item>
<title>RE: Window snapping is good, but could be even better</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/window-snapping-is-good-but-could-be-even-better/?ID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87#2</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/window-snapping-is-good-but-could-be-even-better/?ID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87#2</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[These are 2 things I have on my to-do list, but haven't had time to investigate yet. I would love to have the windows snap before releasing the mouse as well.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
These are 2 things I have on my to-do list, but haven't had time to investigate yet. I would love to have the windows snap before releasing the mouse as well. <img src="https://www.displayfusion.com/MediaCommon/SVGs/FontAwesome/face-smile.light.svg" alt=":)" style="box-sizing:border-box;position:relative;overflow:hidden;vertical-align:middle !important;width:16px;height:16px;" HelpButtonData=":)" HelpButtonDataAlign="BelowMiddle" />
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Window snapping is good, but could be even better</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/window-snapping-is-good-but-could-be-even-better/?ID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:27:20 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/window-snapping-is-good-but-could-be-even-better/?ID=073004cc-ee00-48ab-a848-218386426a87</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, I've tried out the window snapping feature of DisplayFusion and it works fine in some situations but I think it could be even better.  I'm used to WindowSpace from ntwind and that provides different snapping (it snaps as you move the window, instead of after you drop the window) plus it works...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Hi, I've tried out the window snapping feature of DisplayFusion and it works fine in some situations but I think it could be even better.  I'm used to WindowSpace from ntwind and that provides different snapping (it snaps as you move the window, instead of after you drop the window) plus it works with MDI windows (snapping them within the owning application's main window).  The bottom line is that it's much easier to get the result that you want.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>