<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>DisplayFusion RSS: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb</link>
<description>DisplayFusion RSS: Better windows snapping algorithm</description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 05:49:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb</generator>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#7</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#7</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Awesome, thanks Maxim! Those dialogs behave very strangely in XP. We've tried to fix them in the past with no luck]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Awesome, thanks Maxim! Those dialogs behave very strangely in XP. We've tried to fix them in the past with no luck <img src="https://www.displayfusion.com/MediaCommon/SVGs/FontAwesome/face-frown.light.svg" alt=":(" style="box-sizing:border-box;position:relative;overflow:hidden;vertical-align:middle !important;width:16px;height:16px;" HelpButtonData=":(" HelpButtonDataAlign="BelowMiddle" />
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#6</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#6</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Now it works better. Thank you!
BTW, I noticed that snapping feature doesn't work with message boxes and explorer's "run app" (WIN+R) and "delete file" dialogs.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Now it works better. Thank you! <img src="https://www.displayfusion.com/MediaCommon/SVGs/FontAwesome/face-smile.light.svg" alt=":)" style="box-sizing:border-box;position:relative;overflow:hidden;vertical-align:middle !important;width:16px;height:16px;" HelpButtonData=":)" HelpButtonDataAlign="BelowMiddle" /><br/>
<br/>
BTW, I noticed that snapping feature doesn't work with message boxes and explorer's "run app" (WIN+R) and "delete file" dialogs.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#5</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:30:46 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#5</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Ah ok, if you're only snapping to monitor edges then 25px is a good distance, but for snapping to other windows we recommend setting it to 15px or lower. Could you give that a try and let me know if it works any better?
Thanks!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Ah ok, if you're only snapping to monitor edges then 25px is a good distance, but for snapping to other windows we recommend setting it to 15px or lower. Could you give that a try and let me know if it works any better?<br/>
<br/>
Thanks!
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#4</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#4</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[25 pixels,
All checkbox on tab are checked, snapping mode is last one (3), snapping key is Shift.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
25 pixels,<br/>
All checkbox on tab are checked, snapping mode is last one (3), snapping key is Shift.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#3</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#3</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately we haven't had any luck resolving this. What is your snap distance set to?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Unfortunately we haven't had any luck resolving this. What is your snap distance set to?
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#2</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:13:36 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb#2</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the video Maxim! We'll see if there's any way we can improve this.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Thanks for the video Maxim! We'll see if there's any way we can improve this.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Better windows snapping algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/better-windows-snapping-algorithm/?ID=b21c9aca-59d1-4cfe-8cb2-e683b18a08cb</guid>
<category>DisplayFusion</category>
<description><![CDATA[Please check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkpmjqFrs9Q
You know, not always DF snaps dragging window to others.
I think that it is better to separate snapping axises. I. E. snap to one nearest window at X axis at time and one at Y axis.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Please check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkpmjqFrs9Q<br/>
<br/>
You know, not always DF snaps dragging window to others.<br/>
<br/>
I think that it is better to separate snapping axises. I. E. snap to one nearest window at X axis at time and one at Y axis.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>