https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24 DisplayFusion RSS: AeroPeek inelegance Sun, 05 Apr 2026 18:56:29 GMT en hourly 1 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#30 Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:24:10 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#30 DisplayFusion Thanks! And yep, we're constantly working on improving the appearance, but some times they become lower priority when there are critical bugs that need to be worked on. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#29 Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:05:37 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#29 DisplayFusion Sorry for the slow response - trying 3.4.1 beta 7, and the preview sizes look very good to me.

Some of the other "elegance" issues (Delicious style anyone?) are still there, however. I assume they are priority issues.

Overall, much improved. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#28 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:00:23 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#28 DisplayFusion In an effort to cleanup the DisplayFusion Discussions, this topic is being marked as Complete as it hasn't received a response for more than 30 days. If you're still having trouble and would like some help, just let me know!

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#27 Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:06:36 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#27 DisplayFusion Just a quick update, we've done some more work on the thumbnail preview sizes. Could you give 3.4.0 Beta 19 a try?

http://www.displayfusion.com/Download/Beta/

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#26 Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:39:12 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#26 DisplayFusion Ok, thanks for trying that out. We'll look into it some more and hopefully we'll be able to figure out what's causing it soon ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#25 Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:14:09 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#25 DisplayFusion I uninstalled DisplayFusion Beta 9 completely - there was no %ProgramFiles%\DisplayFusion folder left.

I installed Beta 11, and still have the same thing - with the same 3 File Explorer windows DF taskbar shows significantly smaller previews than Win7 taskbar.

I also noticed Win7 taskbar surrounds previews with one pixel black (or very dark) border.

Attached is a picture - the left side is the Win7 taskbar, the right side is the DF taskbar. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#24 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:57:35 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#24 DisplayFusion @NetMage: Quick question. If you uninstall DisplayFusion completely, and remove the %programfiles%\DisplayFusion folder, then reinstall, are the thumbnail preview sizes still incorrect? Just wondering if something is lingering from an old version. Make sure to reinstall with the latest beta from http://www.displayfusion.com/Download/Beta/.

Note that doing the above won't cause you to lose your settings since they're stored in the registry, but you can backup the settings using the button on the Options tab in the DisplayFusion settings just to be safe.

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#23 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:12:11 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#23 DisplayFusion Yep, there's a lot of stuff in this thread, so I'll make sure it's all added into our internal system and then I'll mark the thread as complete.

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#22 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 18:53:51 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#22 DisplayFusion FYI, while the sub-thread is resolved, the other issues are still there, especially the preview size issue. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#21 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:17:52 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#21 DisplayFusion Awesome, no worries! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#20 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:10:24 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#20 DisplayFusion I understand Keith, and I didn't expect (only hoped) for an immediate resolution. I'm simply bringing it to your attention and sincerely hoping you folks can resolve the issue. It would be most appreciated.

In the meantime, I'll update to beta8 and turn off the animation (even though it's really slick ).

Look forward to a fix in the future! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#19 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:03:57 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#19 DisplayFusion Just a quick follow-up on this. We've looked into it and unfortunately due to some other changes made to the taskbar, we won't be able to resolve the auto-hide animation issue yet. In the meantime, you can disable it by setting the "Taskbar: Auto-Hide Animation Disabled" advanced setting to 1. Auto-hide will still work, but it will show/hide without the scrolling animation. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#18 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:34:33 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#18 DisplayFusion Awesome, thanks for your help troubleshooting! We'll hopefully have a fix for one of the next few betas. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#17 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:10:24 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#17 DisplayFusion OK - tested, and here are the results... rolling back to beta 3 in the meantime (as beta 4 caused explorer crashing).

beta 4 - smooth
beta 5 - flicker
beta 6 - flicker
beta 7 - flicker

Thanks for the prompt support! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#16 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:04:09 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#16 DisplayFusion great - thanks.... downloaded... will try all and report back results! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#15 Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:45:43 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#15 DisplayFusion No worries!

It seems to be smooth for me in 3.4.0 Beta 8, but let's see if we can narrow down which version it broke in for you. The installers for 3.4.0 Beta 3 to 7 are attached. If you could start with Beta 3 to confirm that it's definitely ok, then update one by one and let me know what version it broke in, that would be fantastic.

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#14 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:09:30 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#14 DisplayFusion Hi Guys - I just wanted to update this thread with an observation I hope is related. I use Taskbar Autohiding (win7x64 with ATI GPU), and the transition from hide to show is very smooth on DF Beta3 on all monitors. While using DF Beta8, the taskbar show/hide effect very "flickery" (however the "main", non-DF display is smooth). I have not tested with previous versions of the Betas and I can if it would be helpful to the troubleshooting process. Additionally, I am willing to provide any debug logs if helpful.

In the meantime, I am downgrading back down to Beta3 because I actually can't deal with the flickering.

Sorry to be a nitpicker. You guys are definitely rocking on ironing out all the kinks in this release, and it's much appreciated. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#13 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:44:29 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#13 DisplayFusion Sorry, yes I am running 3.4 Beta 6 about to update to Beta 7. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#12 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:54:00 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#12 DisplayFusion Just to verify, are you guys running 3.4.0 Beta 6? ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#11 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:45:15 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#11 DisplayFusion I have also noticed this difference. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#10 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:29:51 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#10 DisplayFusion I checked already and I have no custom settings in HKLM or HKCU for Taskband sizing. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#9 Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:34:00 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#9 DisplayFusion DisplayFusion doesn't read the thumbnail registry settings yet, but we're planning on adding that in the later 3.4.0 Betas.

Can you check this registry key: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Taskband and let me know if there are values like MaxThumbSizePx, etc... if they're there, can you list them?

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#8 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:43:23 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#8 DisplayFusion Both monitors are 1920x1200. Here is a side by side comparison of the same full screen window - left side is DF taskbar preview, right side is Windows taskbar preview.

BTW, does the DF Taskbar preview use the Windows 7 registry settings for Preview size, etc? ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#7 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:35:49 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#7 DisplayFusion Strange! Are both your screens the same resolution? I'm using two 1920x1080 displays, and my preview windows look almost identical in size. See the attached screenshot. ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#6 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:45:15 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/aeropeek-inelegance/?ID=2b6e0598-a25d-48b0-a5de-ec161779ba24#6 DisplayFusion 1. I have not intentionally customized preview sizes - I was not aware of how to do this? For the Windows taskbar, I have no custom registry settings for thumbnails.

2. I am using the normal 100% DPI settings.

3. I believe I did my first testing with Outlook 2010, but looking at Rumba 8.0 and full screen Explorer windows, it appears to be all applications. On Beta 7, it looks like the preview pane itself is also shorter for DF than for Windows 7 taskbar. ]]>