https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774 DisplayFusion RSS: (6.0.0 Beta 8) Aero colour not matching windows Tue, 07 Apr 2026 12:25:06 GMT en hourly 1 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774 https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#6 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:00:22 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#6 DisplayFusion It would appear the issue is indeed fixed!
Thanks for the yet again great support, I'll be going back to greatly enjoying the luxury of DisplayFusion yet again! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#5 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 17:54:33 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#5 DisplayFusion We've just released a new DisplayFusion beta version and this issue should be all fixed up. Please let us know if you run into any trouble after updating.

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#4 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:53:18 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#4 DisplayFusion Thanks! We should have this all fixed up for the next beta. We'll let you know as soon as it's available to test out ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#3 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:33:10 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#3 DisplayFusion Hey Keith,

As requested here are my taskbars, they are set up as inverted windows, centered, and the real windows taskbar on the far right screen. As far as I know I have not changed any aero colours in StartIsBack, nor am I aware of such settings in StartIsBack 2.1.2... Might this have become available in a later version of StartIsBack?! (I am unable to upgrade to StartIsBack+ as I can't upgrade to 8.1 thanks to Microsofts terrific update system... )

On the taskbars note how both DF taskbars are full black and nearly fully opaque (Slightly hard to see on the center one due too the wallpaper, but it is the same colour as the one on the left!). The windows taskbar however follows the Aero colour, and remains a "soft blue"... ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#2 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 16:10:45 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774#2 DisplayFusion We did add support for the StartIsBack taskbar colour in Beta 8. Is your StartIsBack taskbar colour setting different from the Windows Aero colour setting?

Could you attach a screenshot of the taskbars as well?

Thanks! ]]> https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774 Sun, 08 Jun 2014 22:54:11 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.displayfusion.com/Discussions/View/600-beta-8-aero-colour-not-matching-windows/?ID=613eb9ec-8ec1-41bd-af47-fb6441f97774 DisplayFusion Hey there,

Been a while since I've been here! Have had a pretty rocking experience with DF lately!

However ever since I updated to DF 6.0.0 Beta 8 the other day, I noticed that my DF taskbars aren't respecting the windows taskbar colour anymore.. Not sure how to explain this issue any better, I am however sure it worked perfectly fine before updating to beta 8...

Might this be related to the fix with StartIsBack compatibility perhaps? ]]>